🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the presentation of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its response: another massive barrage of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, political struggles are conducted: optimistic declarations are delivered from multiple capitals. Considerable effort is devoted on restraining certain initiatives. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from across the border, a ability enabled by current data. From witness perspectives, defense planes that had been dispatched to engage hostile cruise missiles streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense activated: several firings deployed against a Russian ballistic missile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably supplied through Western nations. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly gives way to resigned acknowledgment: possibly the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and another blackout.

Ongoing Risks

Soon after, a automatic firearm opened up on a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – most likely imported technology. Unfortunately, the projectiles didn't strike the enemy aircraft – it maintained course toward its objective.

With pauses, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: several casualties, destruction and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the evening attack. As always, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those full day demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a reliance that European nations are demonstrably unable to replace in the short term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from American leadership generated strong feelings, controversy and deep concern – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from American administration adheres to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This trend will, undoubtedly, endure.

Tactical Assessments

It is easy to blame specific actors of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration functions according to a premise familiar among seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The US administration assumes that it is unfeasible to pressure the Kremlin to relinquish the territory that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does nothing to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the current condition will not evolve additionally in its advantage in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Moscow is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are coming close to fatigue. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be many attempts to stop fighting, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still hold out, slowly losing lives and land but avoiding a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its benefit.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: political desires to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's twin challenges – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be significantly challenging after current events, it remains highly unlikely that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These conflicting dynamics are driving the talks.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to terminate the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by US administration, opposition by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and demonstrate certain reluctance to modify developments, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, largely rely on sustained allied backing.